1-Hole 2-Hole 3-Back 3-Hole 4-Back 4-Hole Dive Fake Football Play Fullback Go Route Halfback I Formation I Left I Left Tight I Right I Right Tight Left Side Run Long Yardage Medium Yardage Option Out Route Passing Play Pitch Power I Power I Formation Power I Left Power I Right Pro Formation Pro Left Pro Left Tight Pro. A triple option with a. Additional Affiliate Information: Thanks for checking out my latest launch. To qualify for instant commission status you will need to show more than 25 sales here on JV Zoo or I must know you.
The Football Power Index (FPI) is a measure of team strength that is meant to be the best predictor of a team's performance going forward for the rest of the season. FPI represents how many points above or below average a team is. Projected results are based on 10,000 simulations of the rest of the season using FPI, results to date, and the remaining schedule. Ratings and projections update daily.
2018 Football Power Index | |||||||||
RK | TEAM | W-L | PROJ W-L | WIN OUT% | CONF WIN% | REM SOS RK | FPI | ||
1 | Clemson, ACC | 15-0 | 15.0 - 0.0 | -- | 100.0 | -- | 32.7 | ||
2 | Alabama, SEC | 14-1 | 14.0 - 1.0 | -- | 100.0 | -- | 30.1 | ||
3 | Georgia, SEC | 11-3 | 11.0 - 3.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 24.9 | ||
4 | Ohio State, Big Ten | 13-1 | 13.0 - 1.0 | -- | 100.0 | -- | 21.6 | ||
5 | Oklahoma, Big 12 | 12-2 | 12.0 - 2.0 | -- | 100.0 | -- | 21.3 | ||
6 | Michigan, Big Ten | 10-3 | 10.0 - 3.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 20.1 | ||
7 | Notre Dame, FBS Indep. | 12-1 | 12.0 - 1.0 | -- | -- | -- | 19.3 | ||
8 | Penn State, Big Ten | 9-4 | 9.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 18.5 | ||
9 | Miss St, SEC | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 18.4 | ||
10 | Washington, Pac-12 | 10-4 | 10.0 - 4.0 | -- | 100.0 | -- | 17.3 | ||
11 | Florida, SEC | 10-3 | 10.0 - 3.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 17.1 | ||
12 | Auburn, SEC | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 16.0 | ||
13 | Texas A&M, SEC | 9-4 | 9.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 15.9 | ||
14 | Missouri, SEC | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 15.3 | ||
15 | West Virginia, Big 12 | 8-4 | 8.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 15.1 | ||
16 | Iowa, Big Ten | 9-4 | 9.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 15.1 | ||
17 | LSU, SEC | 10-3 | 10.0 - 3.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 14.9 | ||
18 | Washington St, Pac-12 | 11-2 | 11.0 - 2.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 13.6 | ||
19 | Texas, Big 12 | 10-4 | 10.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 13.5 | ||
20 | Utah, Pac-12 | 9-5 | 9.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 13.3 | ||
RK | TEAM | W-L | PROJ W-L | WIN OUT% | CONF WIN% | REM SOS RK | FPI | ||
21 | Stanford, Pac-12 | 9-4 | 9.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 13.0 | ||
22 | Fresno State, MW | 12-2 | 12.0 - 2.0 | -- | 100.0 | -- | 12.4 | ||
23 | Utah State, MW | 11-2 | 11.0 - 2.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 11.8 | ||
24 | Wisconsin, Big Ten | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 11.8 | ||
25 | UCF, American | 12-1 | 12.0 - 1.0 | -- | 100.0 | -- | 11.5 | ||
26 | Kentucky, SEC | 10-3 | 10.0 - 3.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 11.4 | ||
27 | Miami, ACC | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 11.2 | ||
28 | Syracuse, ACC | 10-3 | 10.0 - 3.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 10.8 | ||
29 | Boise State, MW | 10-3 | 10.0 - 3.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 10.4 | ||
30 | Oklahoma State, Big 12 | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 10.3 | ||
31 | Oregon, Pac-12 | 9-4 | 9.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 9.9 | ||
32 | Mich. St., Big Ten | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 9.8 | ||
33 | NC State, ACC | 9-4 | 9.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 9.7 | ||
34 | Texas Tech, Big 12 | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 9.1 | ||
35 | S Carolina, SEC | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 8.3 | ||
36 | Boston College, ACC | 7-5 | 7.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 7.9 | ||
37 | Northwestern, Big Ten | 9-5 | 9.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 7.7 | ||
38 | Iowa State, Big 12 | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 7.5 | ||
39 | Georgia Tech, ACC | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 6.9 | ||
40 | Purdue, Big Ten | 6-7 | 6.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 6.9 | ||
RK | TEAM | W-L | PROJ W-L | WIN OUT% | CONF WIN% | REM SOS RK | FPI | ||
41 | Arizona State, Pac-12 | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 6.7 | ||
42 | UVA, ACC | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 6.4 | ||
43 | Duke, ACC | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 6.4 | ||
44 | Cincinnati, American | 11-2 | 11.0 - 2.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 6.3 | ||
45 | Appalachian St, Sun Belt | 11-2 | 11.0 - 2.0 | -- | 100.0 | -- | 6.2 | ||
46 | USC, Pac-12 | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 6.2 | ||
47 | TCU, Big 12 | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 6.0 | ||
48 | Minnesota, Big Ten | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 5.2 | ||
49 | Pitt, ACC | 7-7 | 7.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 4.8 | ||
50 | Maryland, Big Ten | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 4.6 | ||
51 | Memphis, American | 8-6 | 8.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 4.5 | ||
52 | Cal, Pac-12 | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 4.2 | ||
53 | Vanderbilt, SEC | 6-7 | 6.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 4.2 | ||
54 | Ohio, MAC | 9-4 | 9.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 3.6 | ||
55 | VT, ACC | 6-7 | 6.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 3.4 | ||
56 | Army, FBS Indep. | 11-2 | 11.0 - 2.0 | -- | -- | -- | 3.1 | ||
57 | Nebraska, Big Ten | 4-8 | 4.0 - 8.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 3.1 | ||
58 | Ole Miss, SEC | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 3.0 | ||
59 | Wake Forest, ACC | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 2.7 | ||
60 | BYU, FBS Indep. | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | -- | -- | 2.7 | ||
RK | TEAM | W-L | PROJ W-L | WIN OUT% | CONF WIN% | REM SOS RK | FPI | ||
61 | Baylor, Big 12 | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 2.5 | ||
62 | Kansas State, Big 12 | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 2.0 | ||
63 | Indiana, Big Ten | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 1.9 | ||
64 | Arizona, Pac-12 | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 1.9 | ||
65 | Tennessee, SEC | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 1.2 | ||
66 | Temple, American | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 1.1 | ||
67 | FSU, ACC | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 0.9 | ||
68 | UCLA, Pac-12 | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 0.8 | ||
69 | Colorado, Pac-12 | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | 0.2 | ||
70 | UAB, C-USA | 11-3 | 11.0 - 3.0 | -- | 100.0 | -- | -0.2 | ||
71 | Houston, American | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -0.6 | ||
72 | Toledo, MAC | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -1.1 | ||
73 | Marshall, C-USA | 9-4 | 9.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -1.5 | ||
74 | North Texas, C-USA | 9-4 | 9.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -1.8 | ||
75 | Buffalo, MAC | 10-4 | 10.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -2.1 | ||
76 | Ga Southern, Sun Belt | 10-3 | 10.0 - 3.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -2.4 | ||
77 | UNC, ACC | 2-9 | 2.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -2.6 | ||
78 | Air Force, MW | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -3.2 | ||
79 | Troy, Sun Belt | 10-3 | 10.0 - 3.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -3.2 | ||
80 | Kansas, Big 12 | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -3.2 | ||
RK | TEAM | W-L | PROJ W-L | WIN OUT% | CONF WIN% | REM SOS RK | FPI | ||
81 | Mid Tennessee, C-USA | 8-6 | 8.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -3.7 | ||
82 | Miami (OH), MAC | 6-6 | 6.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -3.9 | ||
83 | N Illinois, MAC | 8-6 | 8.0 - 6.0 | -- | 100.0 | -- | -4.1 | ||
84 | Nevada, MW | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -4.2 | ||
85 | Tulane, American | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -4.2 | ||
86 | FIU, C-USA | 9-4 | 9.0 - 4.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -4.3 | ||
87 | Arkansas State, Sun Belt | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -4.4 | ||
88 | Wyoming, MW | 6-6 | 6.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -4.5 | ||
89 | E Michigan, MAC | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -4.6 | ||
90 | San Diego State, MW | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -4.8 | ||
91 | Arkansas, SEC | 2-10 | 2.0 - 10.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -5.2 | ||
92 | FAU, C-USA | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -5.4 | ||
93 | LA Tech, C-USA | 8-5 | 8.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -6.6 | ||
94 | USF, American | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -7.9 | ||
95 | Southern Miss, C-USA | 6-5 | 6.0 - 5.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -7.9 | ||
96 | W Michigan, MAC | 7-6 | 7.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -8.0 | ||
97 | SMU, American | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -8.2 | ||
98 | Illinois, Big Ten | 4-8 | 4.0 - 8.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -8.5 | ||
99 | Navy, American | 3-10 | 3.0 - 10.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -9.6 | ||
100 | Rutgers, Big Ten | 1-11 | 1.0 - 11.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -10.4 | ||
RK | TEAM | W-L | PROJ W-L | WIN OUT% | CONF WIN% | REM SOS RK | FPI | ||
101 | Tulsa, American | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -10.5 | ||
102 | Louisiana, Sun Belt | 7-7 | 7.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -11.2 | ||
103 | Louisville, ACC | 2-10 | 2.0 - 10.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -11.9 | ||
104 | Oregon St, Pac-12 | 2-10 | 2.0 - 10.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -12.4 | ||
105 | UL Monroe, Sun Belt | 6-6 | 6.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -12.5 | ||
106 | UMass, FBS Indep. | 4-8 | 4.0 - 8.0 | -- | -- | -- | -13.3 | ||
107 | Hawai'i, MW | 8-6 | 8.0 - 6.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -13.4 | ||
108 | Akron, MAC | 4-8 | 4.0 - 8.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -13.7 | ||
109 | Charlotte, C-USA | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -14.0 | ||
110 | UNLV, MW | 4-8 | 4.0 - 8.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -14.3 | ||
111 | Colorado State, MW | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -14.3 | ||
112 | New Mexico, MW | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -14.7 | ||
113 | Liberty, FBS Indep. | 6-6 | 6.0 - 6.0 | -- | -- | -- | -14.8 | ||
114 | Ball State, MAC | 4-8 | 4.0 - 8.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -15.3 | ||
115 | W Kentucky, C-USA | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -15.4 | ||
116 | C. Carolina, Sun Belt | 5-7 | 5.0 - 7.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -15.5 | ||
117 | Old Dominion, C-USA | 4-8 | 4.0 - 8.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -15.8 | ||
118 | Cent Michigan, MAC | 1-11 | 1.0 - 11.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -16.1 | ||
119 | San Jose State, MW | 1-11 | 1.0 - 11.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -16.5 | ||
120 | ECU, American | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -17.7 | ||
RK | TEAM | W-L | PROJ W-L | WIN OUT% | CONF WIN% | REM SOS RK | FPI | ||
121 | Georgia State, Sun Belt | 2-10 | 2.0 - 10.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -18.1 | ||
122 | Bowling Green, MAC | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -18.9 | ||
123 | Kent State, MAC | 2-10 | 2.0 - 10.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -19.4 | ||
124 | New Mexico St, FBS Indep. | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | -- | -- | -20.7 | ||
125 | UTSA, C-USA | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -21.0 | ||
126 | Texas State, Sun Belt | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -21.0 | ||
127 | South Alabama, Sun Belt | 3-9 | 3.0 - 9.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -21.6 | ||
128 | Rice, C-USA | 2-11 | 2.0 - 11.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -23.6 | ||
129 | UConn, American | 1-11 | 1.0 - 11.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -25.3 | ||
130 | UTEP, C-USA | 1-11 | 1.0 - 11.0 | -- | 0.0 | -- | -25.4 |
- PROJ W-L: Projected overall W-L, accounting for results to date and FPI-based projections for remaining scheduled games (and potential conference championship games). May not sum to a whole number because of differing number of games played in each simulation.
- WIN OUT %: Percent of season simulations in which team won all remaining scheduled games as well as conference championship game (if applicable).
- CONF WIN%: Percent of season simulations in which team won its conference, incorporating chance of getting to and winning conference championship game (if applicable). Accounts for shared conference titles in conferences that allow them.
- REM SOS RK: Rank among all FBS teams of remaining schedule strength, from perspective of an average FBS team.
- FPI: Football Power Index that measures team's true strength on net points scale; expected point margin vs average opponent on neutral field.
Lead Generation Software For B2B Leads | Power Leads Pro | Lead Generation Tools
Global rank | 3 067 499 |
---|---|
Daily visitors | 518 |
Daily pageviews | 518 |
Pageviews per user | 1 |
Rating | |
---|---|
Status | Online |
Latest check |
Powerleadspro.com is tracked by us since May, 2012. Over the time it has been ranked as high as 148 799 in the world, while most of its traffic comes from USA, where it reached as high as 285 009 position. It was hosted by Liquid Web Inc. and Liquid Web L.L.C. While GODADDY.COM LLC was its first registrar, now it is moved to GoDaddy.com LLC.
Powerleadspro has a mediocre Google pagerank and bad results in terms of Yandex topical citation index. We found that Powerleadspro.com is poorly ‘socialized’ in respect to any social network. According to Siteadvisor and Google safe browsing analytics, Powerleadspro.com is quite a safe domain with no visitor reviews.
Powerleadspro.com gets 72.7% of its traffic from USA where it is ranked #483258.
Top Ranks
USA | 483 258 |
Powerleadspro.com has 518 visitors and 518 pageviews daily.
Powerleadspro.com has no subdomains with considerable traffic.
Powerleadspro.com has Google PR 1 and its top keyword is 'power leads pro' with 58.71% of search traffic.
-
Yandex CY
Metadata Updates Get morePowerleadspro.com metadata updates
Top Keywords % of search traffic
power leads pro | 58.71% |
fb lead pro | 2.52% |
power lead | |
powerleads | |
leads |
Powerleadspro.com domain is owned by Registration Private Domains By Proxy, LLC and its registration expires in 2 months.
General Get morePowerleadspro.com whois history
Registration Private Domains By Proxy, LLC
Owner since May 28, 2016
|
||
---|---|---|
2 months left
Expires on September 12, 2019
|
8 years old
Created on September 12, 2010
|
5 years ago
Changed at February 01, 2014
|
Registrar and Status
Registar | GODADDY.COM, LLC |
Status |
clientDeleteProhibited
clientRenewProhibited
clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited
|
Similar Domain Names
- 1. powerleadsprosolutions.com
- 2. power-leads-pro.tenderapp.com
- 3. freeleads.janus-power-lead-system.com
- 4. powergrip-h2o-waterproof-battery-powered-gopro-gri.backerkit.com
- 5. powerleadgenerator.com
Powerleadspro.com is hosted by Liquid Web, L.L.C.
IP Whois Get morePowerleadspro.com server history
-
Liquid Web, L.L.C
-
69.16.213.132IP address
Server Technologies
-
Apache HTTP ServerBackend server
Nameservers
- ns.liquidweb.com
- ns1.liquidweb.com
host | value | ttl |
---|---|---|
powerleadspro.com |
69.16.213.132
|
3589 |
host | value | ttl | pri |
---|---|---|---|
powerleadspro.com |
powerleadspro.com
|
3600 | 10 |
host | value | ttl |
---|---|---|
powerleadspro.com |
ns.liquidweb.com
|
3590 |
powerleadspro.com |
ns1.liquidweb.com
|
3590 |
host | value | ttl |
---|---|---|
powerleadspro.com |
Mname: ns.liquidweb.com
Rname: admin.liquidweb.com Serial: 2018110401 Refresh: 86400 Retry: 7200 Expire: 3600000 Minimum-ttl: 14400 |
3600 |
host | value | ttl |
---|---|---|
powerleadspro.com |
Txt: v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:209.59.181.23 +ip4:69.16.213.132 ~all
|
3600 |
Safety status of Powerleadspro.com is described as follows: Google Safe Browsing reports its status as safe.
MyWOT
Overall reputation | Unknown |
---|---|
Trustworthiness | Unknown |
Privacy | Unknown |
Child safety | Unknown |
User reviews
Reputation | Unknown | |
---|---|---|
0
negative
|